1859-S OC-2
Repunched 18

Die Pair 2 - B
Date Grid B / 4-4.5 / Level
Obverse Die States a, b
Estimated Rarity R4
1, 9 Vertical H, H
Reverse Die States a



Comments:
   This is the only use of Obverse 2 and the only use of Reverse B.


Obverse 2

The photo below shows the Obverse 2 attribution grid.



1859-S Obverse 2 attribution grid

Obverse 2 shows no notable die markers, but the date position is sufficient different from Obverse 1 to allow positive attribution. Early die states show significant repunching on 18 (see the arrows in the photo above), but Obverse 1 shows very similar repunching, so this isn’t a good marker to use for attribution.

Obverse 2 Die States
  1. Perfect die.
  2. Die polishing has removed all evidence of repunching on the 18.
No later die states have been observed.


Reverse B

The photo below shows the mintmark position for Reverse B. Note that the Reverse B mintmark position is virtually identical to that of Reverse A, and it shows no notable markers. The obverse date position should be used to attribute the die marriage.



1859-S Reverse B mintmark


Reverse B Die States
  1. Perfect die.
No later die states have been observed. We noted the reverse die cracks that are common on later states of Reverse A. Reverse B has never been seen with die cracks, so this can be an additional marker to confirm attribution. Most examples of OC-2 that we’ve seen have exhibited at least minor clockwise die rotation. In later states this rotation reached at least 20 degrees. We haven’t seen rotated examples of OC-1, so this can be another usable marker.



Photo credits:

Obverse 2 and Reverse B:   1859-S PCGS XF45, from the Osburn-Cushing reference collection.


Copyright © 2015-2021, by Dick Osburn and Brian Cushing, All rights reserved.