Comments:
   This is the only use of Obverse 2 and the only use of Reverse B.
|
Obverse 2
The photo below shows the Obverse 2 attribution grid.
1859-S Obverse 2 attribution grid
Obverse 2 shows no notable die markers, but the date position is sufficient different from Obverse 1 to allow positive attribution.
Early die states show significant repunching on 18 (see the arrows in the photo above), but Obverse 1 shows very similar
repunching, so this isn’t a good marker to use for attribution.
Obverse 2 Die States
- Perfect die.
- Die polishing has removed all evidence of repunching on the 18.
No later die states have been observed.
|
Reverse B
The photo below shows the mintmark position for Reverse B. Note that the Reverse B mintmark position is virtually
identical to that of Reverse A, and it shows no notable markers. The obverse date position should be used to
attribute the die marriage.
1859-S Reverse B mintmark
Reverse B Die States
- Perfect die.
No later die states have been observed. We noted the reverse die cracks that are common on later states of Reverse A.
Reverse B has never been seen with die cracks, so this can be an additional marker to confirm attribution.
Most examples of OC-2 that we’ve seen have exhibited at least minor clockwise die rotation. In later states this
rotation reached at least 20 degrees. We haven’t seen rotated examples of OC-1, so this can be another usable marker.
|